<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Case For Support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donovanmanagement.com/wptest/category/case-for-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donovanmanagement.com/wptest</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:43:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Case Statement &#8211; Then and Now</title>
		<link>http://donovanmanagement.com/wptest/2009/07/26/the-case-statement-then-and-now/</link>
		<comments>http://donovanmanagement.com/wptest/2009/07/26/the-case-statement-then-and-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James A. Donovan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case For Support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.147.242.191/~donovanm/wptest/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back Then Looking back to 1986 when Donovan Management, Inc., (DMI) started assisting nonprofits achieve greater success, the number of Florida nonprofit organizations was just starting to grow. Along with that growth came increased competition for the philanthropic dollar. That led to nonprofits scrambling to differentiate themselves from like organizations. Differentiation was particularly important in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 100%; color: #3366ff;"><strong>Back Then</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 100%;"><strong>Looking back to 1986</strong> when <em>Donovan Management, Inc., (DMI)</em> started assisting nonprofits achieve greater success, the number of Florida nonprofit organizations was just starting to grow. Along with that growth came <em>increased competition</em> for the philanthropic dollar. That led to nonprofits scrambling to <em>differentiate</em> themselves from like organizations. <em>Differentiation</em> was particularly important in crafting a case statement.</span></p>
<p>I actually got my first dose of case statement <em>differentiation</em> before I started DMI. You could call it &#8212; a case study in case development. It was in the early 80’s when I was Executive Director of the University of Central Florida Foundation (UCF). Back then, public universities were just starting their fund raising programs. UCF was one of the State’s newest universities. As such, its alumni were in their late 20<span style="font-size: 85%;">s </span>to 30<span style="font-size: 85%;">s</span>, starting families or businesses with little left to contribute to their alma mater. In addition, most UCF alumni wondered why a public university needed their private gifts.</p>
<p><strong>The challenge</strong> <strong>got more difficult</strong> when we tried to make the case for giving to the UCF Foundation from non-alumni individuals, business, industry and associations &#8212; that is, the Central Florida community itself. The four main objections were:</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 100%;">1<em>.</em></span><em> Why does a publicly supported university need private/philanthropic support?</p>
<p></em><span style="font-size: 100%;">2</span><em>. If UCF needs more money, the legislature should provide it.</p>
<p></em><span style="font-size: 100%;">3</span>.<em> As a business we pay State taxes which in turn end up in UCF’s budget.</p>
<p></em><span style="font-size: 100%;">4<em>.</em></span><em> For UCF to ask the community to give would hurt Rollins College a private school which isn’t supported by the State.<br />
</em><br />
<strong>The breakthrough</strong> <strong>for our case</strong> came when we explained to our target constituency the difference between a State <em>supported </em>university and a State <em>assisted</em> one. The difference was that less than 50% of UCF’s budget, at that time, was provided by State funds. The balance came from many other sources such as tuition, fees, vending machine income, earned income, and philanthropy.</p>
<p align="left">However, the philanthropy piece was negligible compared to the UCF’s multi-million dollar budget. Thus, one would wonder how could even a small percentage of philanthropic support have a major impact on such a large budget? We called that small amount <em>The Margin of Excellence</em> since philanthropic gifts allowed the university to do more than was possible with State funds alone.</p>
<p><strong>Our rationale</strong> was that State funds enabled UCF to be a <em>good</em> university; however, philanthropic support (private gifts and grants) augmenting State dollars could make the UCF a <em>great </em>university. Why? Because the philanthropic dollars could be used in ways State funds could not. Like, creating an endowed professorship where earnings could be used to augment a State salary line thereby giving UCF an advantage over another university trying to recruit the same distinguished professor.</p>
<p>Our case resulted in a five part series of advertisements in the <strong>Orlando Sentinel</strong>. Each quarter page ad was underwritten by a donor. The ads were reprinted and sent to prospective donors as well. The response to the ads was terrific. We got calls from community leaders saying, <em>“Now I get it.”<br />
</em><br />
<strong><span style="color: #3366ff;">Today</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>Keep in mind</strong> that case statements need to go beyond the criteria noted here. Your case must appeal to a new generation of mega-donors, Baby Boomers who have inherited millions or made millions in selling their business.</p>
<p>Unlike their parents who gave with little thought of recognition, today’s mega-donors want something different. <em>They want to be as successful in giving their money away as in making it.</em> <em>In short, they want to be seen by their peers as wise/successful philanthropists.<br />
</em><br />
<strong>For example,</strong> compare these two fictitious case statement tag lines for a major research university:</p>
<p>University A<em> &#8212; <strong><span style="color: #3366ff;">Exceeding Expectations and Excellence in Research</span><br />
</strong><br />
</em>University B<em> &#8212; <span style="color: #3366ff;"><strong>Successful Philanthropists Drive our Research</strong></span></em><span style="color: #3366ff;"></p>
<p></span>The tag line of University A is all about the institution while the University B tag line is clearly focused on the donor.</p>
<p><em><strong>Today</strong> </em>if you want to tap into the growing number of Baby Boomers and mega-donors <em><strong>don’t</strong></em> make your case about <strong>YOU.</strong></p>
<p><strong>M</strong><em><strong>ake it</strong></em> about <strong>THEM,</strong> because without <strong>THEM</strong> you can’t exceed expectations or drive research.</p>
<p>If you would like our assistance in researching and preparing a compelling case for giving to your organization, please contact us at: <a href="mailto:dmimgt@aol.com">dmimgt@aol.com</a> or call us at: 407-321-0024. We have an excellent team of writers.</p>
<p>Your comments on this or other Blog postings are most welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://donovanmanagement.com/wptest/2009/07/26/the-case-statement-then-and-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

